Here's two really nice examples of interruptive online advertising that does work - a MPU for Amnesty and an expandable banner for Renault - however, how effective will the nth viewing be, let alone the nth execution to copy the same executional trick, is questionable.
Which tallies nicely with these comments from the Fallon Planning blog:
the WSJ reports on the "rise" of digital advertising and it's importance for the future. While this piece doesn't get into much new info (to us at least), perhaps an in-depth article in a traditional, respected publication (particularly to the people who need convincing that this is the real shit) will help further spread the word on how critical a shift it is. In fact, the Journal projects that, by 2011, the digital adspace will be closing in on a $40 billion industry. Though it's good to see a traditional business paper talking on new media, honestly I would argue (and I think most of you would agree) the "brave new world" of advertising is not banner ads, paid search, etc but how companies are going to capitalize on social media to reach their target. For example, I'm a big car fan. I'm often on car sites, building and comparing models, etc etc. So let's say Nissan were to track my internet activity, and consequently splash a banner ad on Facebook because I was poking around on the Nissan website moments before, curious about a new model...wouldn't really mean shit to me. But, if they found a way to integrate themselves into the 15, 20 minutes or more I spend on the site (groups I'm in, people I'm friends with) then they may grab my attention. Hell, do a search for "Nissan" groups on FB and you get +500 results. So why not a Nissan sponsored group-- host events, membership discounts, factory tours, visits to HQ-- capitalize on the brand evangelists! Just one example, and I'm sure there are many more.
the WSJ reports on the "rise" of digital advertising and it's importance for the future. While this piece doesn't get into much new info (to us at least), perhaps an in-depth article in a traditional, respected publication (particularly to the people who need convincing that this is the real shit) will help further spread the word on how critical a shift it is. In fact, the Journal projects that, by 2011, the digital adspace will be closing in on a $40 billion industry.
Though it's good to see a traditional business paper talking on new media, honestly I would argue (and I think most of you would agree) the "brave new world" of advertising is not banner ads, paid search, etc but how companies are going to capitalize on social media to reach their target.
For example, I'm a big car fan. I'm often on car sites, building and comparing models, etc etc. So let's say Nissan were to track my internet activity, and consequently splash a banner ad on Facebook because I was poking around on the Nissan website moments before, curious about a new model...wouldn't really mean shit to me.
But, if they found a way to integrate themselves into the 15, 20 minutes or more I spend on the site (groups I'm in, people I'm friends with) then they may grab my attention. Hell, do a search for "Nissan" groups on FB and you get +500 results. So why not a Nissan sponsored group-- host events, membership discounts, factory tours, visits to HQ-- capitalize on the brand evangelists! Just one example, and I'm sure there are many more.
Hah - thought I'd get through a whole post without it mentioning Facebook? You were wrong...
Subscribe to Advertising 2.0 by email or RSS
Robin Grant
Blogging for:
Member since: 03 Jun 2008
Last login: 02 Jun 2009
Total Posts: 733
